Tumblelog by Soup.io
Newer posts are loading.
You are at the newest post.
Click here to check if anything new just came in.

January 21 2016

victor3scott1

PorA³wnanie wydajnohci

"\"\\\"\\\\\\\"\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nIntroduction\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nCurrently, Solidworks only officially supports NVIDIA Quadro as well as AMD FirePro discrete video cards therefore if you want to create use of the supported card you may need to work together with a workstation-class GPU. However, in the big event you certainly are generally a student understanding Solidworks or even or else not in the position to make use involving a Quadro card, it actually is totally feasible to utilize the GeForce or even Radeon card instead. An Individual is possibly not able to have assistance from Solidworks if you've a problem making use of their computer software (which causes it to be an extremely bad idea for a professional environment) however, if that will not matter for you then it could be a simple way to use Solidworks about some type regarding computer anyone previously own.\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nIn this short article we will be looking with a selection of NVIDIA GeForce cards and also looking at these people to the 3 most favored NVIDIA Quadro cards with regard to Solidworks. In Order To fully test the particular cards we will be using a registry edit to trick Solidworks straight into enabling features similar to RealView that are usually disabled unless you've the workstation card. This is absolutely something we do not recommend performing in the large event you are using Solidworks professionally, however it will help us figure out the actual total performance differences in between Quadro and also GeForce cards. In case you would like to always be able to skip more than our individual benchmark outcomes as well as merely view our conclusions, feel free to leap ahead towards the conclusion section.\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nTest Setup\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nFor our test system, we used the particular next hardware:\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nTesting Hardware\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nMotherboard: \\\\\\\\tAsus Z170-A\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nCPU: \\\\\\\\tIntel Core i7 6700K 4.0GHz Quad Core 8MB 95W\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nRAM: \\\\\\\\t4x Crucial DDR4-2133 4GB (16GB total)\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nGPU: \\\\\\\\tGeForce GTX Titan X 12GB (~$970 - 6144 GFLOPS)\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nGeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB (~$650 - 5632 GFLOPS)\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nGeForce GTX 980 4GB (~$520 - 4616 GFLOPS)\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nGeForce GTX 970 4GB (~$350 - 3494 GFLOPS)\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nGeForce GTX 960 4GB (~$240 - 2308 GFLOPS)\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nGeForce GTX 950 2GB (~$160 - 1573 GFLOPS)\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nPNY Quadro M4000 8GB (~$740 - 2573 GFLOPS)\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nPNY Quadro K2200 4GB (~$600 - 1339 GFLOPS)\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nPNY Quadro K620 2GB (~$200 - 812.5 GFLOPS)\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nHard Drive: \\\\\\\\tSamsung 850 Pro 512GB SATA 6Gb\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\/s SSD\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nOS: \\\\\\\\tWindows 10 Pro 64-bit\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nPSU: \\\\\\\\tEVGA SuperNOVA 850W P2\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nSoftware: \\\\\\\\tSolidworks 2016 SP 0.1\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nOur test platform is built about an Intel Core i7 6700K as that's the actual CPU that should supply the most effective performance throughout Solidworks when rotating models. for the actual video cards we will possibly be screening the particular complete range of current GeForce GTX cards as well as the 3 most favored Quadro card with regard to Solidworks. Throughout your chart over we outlined each an estimate price for the card as well since the peak theoretical floating point performance (which can be single precision) so it will most likely be very worthwhile to determine in the huge event the driver as well as firmware differences between the cards tends to always be able to make Quadro quicker than it's rough performance equivalent.\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nRemember which Quadro (and FirePro) cards tend to be the only officially supported video cards, consequently in order to totally test the particular performance variations we had to do some registry tweaking in order to basically trick Solidworks straight into enabling all the features that are typically disabled once you use a GeForce card - many notably RealView. For You To do this, we performed the actual next steps regarding every GeForce card:\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n open your registry (Run -> regedit)\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n Navigate in order to \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"HKEY_CURRENT_USERSOFTWARESolidworksSOLIDWORKS 2016PerformanceGraphicsHardwareCurrent\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n Double click around the \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"Renderer\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\" key and also copy the text below \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"Value Data\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\". for example, for the GTX 980 ours ended up being \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"GeForce GTX 980\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\/PCIe\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\/SSE2\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n Navigate in order to \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"HKEY_CURRENT_USERSOFTWARESolidworksSOLIDWORKS 2016PerformanceGraphicsGl2ShadersNV40\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n Right-click on the NV40 folder about the left pane as well as select \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"New -> Key\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n Rename the newest crucial with the thing that will was copied within step #3\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n the just crucial on this folder must be considered a \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"(Default)\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\" key\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n Right-click on the right pane along with select \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"New -> DWORD (32-bit) Value\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n name this new important \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"Workarounds\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n Double-click around the \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"Workarounds\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\" important and type in the worthiness \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"30408\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\". You need to be in Hexadecimal mode.\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n RealView should certainly be available. In case it is not, try setting the worthiness throughout step #10 to \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"31408\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\" or \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"30008\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nBe warned which editing your current registry could cause serious problems should you make a mistake, therefore only perform higher than should you are comfy poking about in the registry. This goes without stating that we can't always be held liable for just about any problems that will may occur when next the above mentioned steps.\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nTo perform the real benchmarking, we used a new mix regarding AutoIt scripts and Solidworks macros in order to set the actual different top quality settings, load your relevant model, as well as record the common FPS while rotating your model. Note that we tested with various LOD settings, yet we found the major difference to be marginal therefore to maintain issues straightforward we are generally likely to just be reporting the outcomes using LOD off (which generally results in a tiny drop inside FPS). Right now there really are a quantity of different ways we're able to have recorded your FPS, however we opted in order to merely use a macro having a timer to rotate the actual model 45 degrees for the nearly everywhere for any set variety of frames. Coming From the number of frames and furthermore the total moment it took to render individuals frames, we are able to decide the common FPS (frames for each second). one key factor is always that we made sure that each along with every model began with just about all the view set for you to front-top so that just about any reflections and also shadows would remain within view as the model has been getting rotated.\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nFor our test models, we chose the next models available from GrabCad.com that may give us outcomes to find a selection of model complexities based on the total quantity of parts and also number of triangles. These types of models are:\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nSteam engine w\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\/ Horizontal Beam\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nby Ridwan Septyawan\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n80 parts - .26 million triangles\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nSpalker\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nby Andy Downs\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n364 parts - .5 million triangles\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n \\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nAudi R8\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nby ma73us\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n434 parts - 1.4 million triangles\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n \\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nOne note that we want to create is the really fact that if you do not really recognize how many triangles the models you train with have, the actual easiest approach we realize of to discover out is to merely save your model as an .STL file. Throughout your save process, a window must popup along with info about the model such as your variety of files, your file size, and additionally the quantity of triangles.\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n1080p Results\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nSteam Motor along with Horizontal Beam and also Centrifugal Pump\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nTo begin items off we're likely to take a glance at the simplest in our test models which in turn only has 80 parts along with .26 million triangles.\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nWith exactly the \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"Shaded\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\" view mode the particular GeForce cards does O.K. although with out RealView not one of the most costly GeForce card was virtually any better than even a low-end Quadro. Together With RealView about the lower end GeForce cards were actually a bit a lot far better than your Quadro K620. However, to match the particular Quadro K2200 you'd need a GeForce GTX 980 Ti which may be truly the little more expensive. With the particular upper end, not one of the GeForce cards we tested were in a new situation to match your performance in the Quadro M4000.\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nWhere the results get intriguing will be whenever we used the actual \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"Shaded w\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\/ Edges\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\" view mode. with edges enabled we saw absolutely terrible performance with almost all the GeForce cards. Also a new GeForce GTX 980 Ti as well as Titan X had been nowhere near the performance associated with even the Quadro K620 which in turn less when compared to a third your price.\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nSpalker\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nThe Spalker model contains concerning 4.5 occasions much more parts along with twice your number of triangles compared in order to the prior model. Our results tend to be somewhat much like what we noticed with the Steam engine model, although making use of the actual \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"Shaded\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\" view mode the actual GeForce cards performed much even worse than the particular usual Quadro K620 with out RealView. Together With RealView, most of the GeForce cards only barely outperformed the particular K620. Interestingly, all of the GeForce cards performed approximately in par to the additional person with all the exception of the GTX 950.\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nSwitching to the \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"Shaded w\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\/ Edges\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\" view mode, we once again discover huge performance drops with the GeForce cards for the point the Quadro K620 handily beats even the actual highest end GeForce card.\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nAudi R8\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nWhile the particular Audi R8 model doesn't have many a lot more parts compared in order to the Spalker model, it can possess concerning 3 times the particular number of triangles making it probably the particular most complex model we will be testing.\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nIn \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"Shaded\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\" mode without having RealView, the results are rather just like what we should observed using the additional a pair of models. Although the GTX 980 Ti can be able to match the actual Quadro K620, all associated with another models see lower performance. Along With RealView enabled, however, the vast majority of the GeForce cards actually performed regarding on par with all the Quadro M4000. Interestingly, after in regards in order to the GTX 960, we did not view a significant boost in performance.\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nWith \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"Shaded w\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\/ Edges\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\", your pattern associated with poor performance using GeForce cards continues. As Quickly As again, even the particular Quadro K620 will very handily outperform any GeForce card.\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n1080p GeForce benchmark throughout Solidworks 2016\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n4K Results\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nSteam engine along with Horizontal Beam as well as Centrifugal Pump\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nEven using our the majority of straightforward model, we begin to see a bit better performance out in the GeForce cards from 4K resolutions. Whilst with 1080p i was mostly merely matching your performance in the Quadro K620, now the particular GeForce cards in many cases are outperforming the actual Quadro K620 and at times even the Quadro K2200.\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nStarting when again along with \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"Shaded\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\" mode, all the GeForce cards give performance that's right involving the K620 along with K2200 without RealView. Using RealView enabled, performance is actually better still with all the GeForce cards outperforming your Quadro K2200 although none had been in the place to match the Quadro M4000\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nWith \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"Shaded w\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\/ Edges\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\", even the actual highest finish GeForce card nonetheless performs even worse compared to Quadro K620 without having RealView enabled. with RealView on, the performance ranges from a bit more serious compared to always be able to the Quadro K620 to some bit worse than the Quadro K2200 depending about the model involving GeForce card.\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nSpalker\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nWith any bit more advanced model, we once again notice performance greater than the actual Quadro K620 with the \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"Shaded\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\" view mode. Together With RealView disabled, the actual GeForce cards in best matched the particular Quadro K2200 with a fantastic deal of of them falling somewhere between your K620 as well as K2200 throughout relation to performance. Using RealView on, however, only the GTX 950 performed even worse compared to Quadro K2200 with all another after a bit far better (although nonetheless not really the particular the amount of the actual Quadro M4000)\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nSwitching in order to \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"Shaded w\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\/ Edges\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\", your GeForce cards nonetheless mostly outperformed the particular Quadro K620, although none of these had been in the situation to match the actual Quadro K2200.\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nAudi R8\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nWith the particular Audi R8 model, the final results really tend to be a bit distinct from what we should noticed previously. starting once more with almost all the \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"Shaded\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\" view mode, we noticed performance in which ranged from matching the particular Quadro K620 to being a new bit lower than your Quadro K2200 with out RealView. with RealView enabled, performance has been actually signficantly much better together with even the actual GTX 950 outperforming the Quadro K2200. at best, however, even the highest end GeForce card was only in any position to match the particular Quadro M4000.\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nUsing \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"Shaded w\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\/ Edges\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\", performance with almost all the GeForce cards once more has a nose dive. With Out RealView, not 1 regarding the GeForce cards had been capable of carry out even shut to the Quadro K620. Using Realview, however, the actual GTX 970\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\/980 approximately matched the actual Quadro K620 even even though the higher end GeForce cards performed right involving the K620 and K2200.\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n1080p GeForce benchmark in Solidworks 2016\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nConclusion\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nOne factor is obvious coming from our results: GeForce cards have absolutely terrible performance once you make use regarding the \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"Shaded w\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\/ Edges\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\" view mode. With 1080p, not even the actual highest end GeForce card has been able to match the particular very economical Quadro K620. A New GeForce GTX 980 Ti or even Titan X needs to always be able to be still be able to provide a person with regarding 60 FPS pertaining to medium models (around .5 million triangles) and also about 30 FPS for very complex models (around a million triangles), yet you'll notice significantly higher performance with a Quadro card of roughly the same price. When you employ the 4K display, however, many of the GeForce cards are usually able to out-perform your Quadro K620 although considering the fact that your K620 simply features 2GB involving VRAM we would never recommend deploying it using a 4K display within the initial place. Really, the particular Quadro K2200 will be the cheapest finish card we would recommend regarding 4K along with that will card must always outperform even the particular highest finish GeForce card.\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nIf an individual simply make use of the \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"Shaded\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\" view mode, the particular GeForce cards usually give performance somewhere in-between the actual Quadro K2200 along with Quadro M4000 in each 1080p as well as 4K resolutions. Precisely what is actually interesting is that in 1080p the actual performance distinction between the different GeForce models will be truly really minimal. From 4K, however, there's a advantage to having approximately the GTX 970, nevertheless beyond the performance does not improve significantly.\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nUsing your Audi R8 model particularly (since that is one in the most complex model), we could result within the subsequent rough estimations with the performance associated with GeForce cards in comparison for you to Quadro cards if we typical the results with RealView each upon along with off:\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nShaded view mode \\\\\\\\t1080p \\\\\\\\t4K\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nGeForce GTX 950 2GB \\\\\\\\tEquivalent in order to K2200 \\\\\\\\t18% slower compared to K2200\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nGeForce GTX 960 4GB \\\\\\\\t5% faster when compared with K2200 \\\\\\\\t10% slower compared to K2200\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nGeForce GTX 970 4GB \\\\\\\\t3% quicker when compared with K2200 \\\\\\\\tEquivalent in order to K2200\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nGeForce GTX 980 4GB \\\\\\\\t3% quicker compared to K2200 \\\\\\\\t5% slower as compared to K2200\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nGeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB \\\\\\\\t9% quicker compared to K2200 \\\\\\\\t7% faster as compared to K2200\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nGeForce GTX Titan X 12GB \\\\\\\\t5% faster as compared to K2200 \\\\\\\\t2% slower when compared with K2200\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nShaded w\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\/ Edges view mode \\\\\\\\t1080p \\\\\\\\t4K\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nGeForce GTX 950 2GB \\\\\\\\t40% associated with K620 \\\\\\\\t32% of K2200\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nGeForce GTX 960 4GB \\\\\\\\t45% regarding K620 \\\\\\\\t38% associated with K2200\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nGeForce GTX 970 4GB \\\\\\\\t54% of K620 \\\\\\\\t52% associated with K2200\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nGeForce GTX 980 4GB \\\\\\\\t60% associated with K620 \\\\\\\\t52% of K2200\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nGeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB \\\\\\\\t65% of K620 \\\\\\\\t62% involving K2200\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nGeForce GTX Titan X 12GB \\\\\\\\t66% of K620 \\\\\\\\t62% of K2200\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nOverall, with just \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"Shaded\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\" mode the particular GeForce cards mostly performed within 10% of the Quadro K2200. However, the important problem we found is that GeForce cards possess significant performance problems when using your \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"Shaded w\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\/ Edges\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\" view mode to the point that will even a new Quadro K620 will frequently give significantly far better performance.\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\r\\\\\\\\nThe cause at your rear of this can be not simple to determine, although good guess is that it's got to complete with the firmware the Quadro cards used instead of driver-based optimizations. Possibly way, if just about all you've is a GeForce card then Solidworks should function perfectly - although you would need to tweak your registry in order to enable RealView - but we would really recommend upgrading for an suitable Quadro card as soon as possible. especially if you use Solidworks professionally, the particular additional performance (not to mention simply utilizing a supported card) means that you ought to almost never consider employing a GeForce card instead of the Quadro card.\\\\\\\"\\\"\"



Tags: komputery

Don't be the product, buy the product!

Schweinderl